[1]U.S. appeals court upholds West Virginia restriction on abortion pill sales
By John Raby/Associated Press
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld a lower court’s decision to restrict abortion pill sales in West Virginia.
A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, affirmed a ruling by a U.S. district judge in 2023 despite federal regulators’ approval of the abortion pill as a safe and effective medication.
Most Republican-controlled states have enacted or adopted abortion bans of some kind, including restricting abortion pills by default, since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 overturned Roe v. Wade [2], the 1973 ruling that provided nationwide access to abortion. All have been challenged in court. The Supreme Court ruled in the case [3] of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Chambers had ruled that the near-total abortion ban [4] signed by then-Republican Gov. Jim Justice in September 2022 took precedence over approvals from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
“For us to once again federalize the issue of abortion without a clear directive from Congress, right on the heels of Dobbs, would leave us one small step short of defiance,” 4th Circuit Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III wrote for the court.
“One can of course agree or disagree with the Dobbs decision. But that is not the point,” Wilkinson said. “At a time when the rule of law is under blunt assault, disregarding the Supreme Court is not an option.”
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey, who took office in January, had defended challenges to the abortion law when he served as attorney general.
“Big win out of the 4th Circuit today,” Morrisey said in a statement.
GenBioPro Inc., the country’s only manufacturer of a generic version of the abortion pill mifepristone, had argued that the state cannot block access to a FDA-approved drug. Chambers had dismissed the majority of GenBioPro’s challenges, finding there is “no disputing that health, medicine, and medical licensure are traditional areas of state authority.”
Appeals judge DeAndrea Gist Benjamin concurred and dissented in part Tuesday, calling it a “troubling opinion.”
“Put plainly, this law erects barriers to life-saving healthcare for countless West Virginians in ways not envisioned by Congress,” Benjamin wrote.
Not at issue in the appeal was a challenge by GenBioPro concerning a separate West Virginia law that stopped providers from prescribing mifepristone by telehealth. Chambers had allowed that challenge to proceed. The U.S. Supreme Court last year unanimously preserved access to mifepristone [5], which is used in nearly two-thirds of all abortions [6] in the U.S. in 2023.
Federal judge issues new injunction blocking Planned Parenthood defunding
By BP Staff
BOSTON (BP) – The federal judge who issued a temporary restraining order [7] blocking the portion of Congress’ “Big Beautiful Bill” that removes federal funds from abortion providers has doubled down, issuing a revised order Friday, July 11.
The Trump administration had asked U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani to dissolve her initial July 7 order, calling it “highly unusual” and claiming she had not provided any explanation for her ruling.
Talwani did dissolve the initial ruling last Friday and issued a new one, in which she claims that she believes Planned Parenthood is likely to succeed in its efforts to show the law is unconstitutional. The nation’s largest abortion provider claims that the removal of funds affects even its clinics that don’t provide abortions, which violates those clinics’ First Amendment guarantee of freedom of association. That is, their association with the larger Planned Parenthood organization would result in a loss of funds, even though the clinics in question do not perform abortions.
Talwani’s ruling, however, requires funds to continue being disbursed to all Planned Parenthood facilities, not just those whose First Amendment rights are in question.
After the judge’s initial ruling last week, Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission Chief of Staff Milles Mullin said such a fight was not unexpected.
“Planned Parenthood is not going to quietly acquiesce to losing nearly $2 million a day in taxpayer dollars that funded its diabolical efforts prior to the passage of the Big Beautiful Bill,” Mullin said.
A hearing in the case is scheduled for July 21.
Related posts:
‘Unapologetically pro-life’: Southern Baptists’ rocky road to Roe’s reversal 
EXPLAINER: How do Americans view the issue of abortion, really? 
FIRST-PERSON: What the Dobbs case means for pro-life Christians 
Life after Roe: responding to a historic Supreme Court decision 
Tennessee second state to criminalize ‘abortion trafficking’ of minors 
The history of the March for Life 
FIRST-PERSON: On abortion, illegal is huge; unnecessary, unthinkable are bigger win 
41 U.S. cities ban abortion as Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn