CALIFORNIA (AP/RNS) — Three evangelical churches in California have sued Gov. Gavin Newsom for banning singing and chanting in places of worship but permitting such activities elsewhere.
[IMGONLY=54722@left@50%]The state’s July 13 order, which closed churches in at least 30 counties, permits worship services as well as fitness centers, hotels, shopping malls and protests to remain open or active in Mendocino and Butte counties, where the suing churches are located.
“Singing and chanting, however, is only banned in places of worship,” says the 20-page complaint filed Wednesday (July 15) in a federal district court by the American Center for Law and Justice and two other legal groups.
Calvary Chapel Ukiah, Calvary Chapel Fort Bragg and River of Life Church in Oroville asked the court to halt officials in the state and their counties from enforcing the orders that call for no singing in houses of worship.
“Banning singing in California churches is an unconstitutional abuse of power,” said Jordan Sekulow, executive director of the ACLJ, in an announcement about the suit.
The state’s early July guidance for houses of worship notes a higher risk of transmitting COVID-19 in a congregational setting of multiple households.
“In particular, activities such as singing and chanting negate the risk-reduction achieved through six feet of physical distancing,” the 14-page document says. “Places of worship must therefore discontinue indoor singing and chanting activities and limit indoor attendance to 25% of building capacity or a maximum of 100 attendees, whichever is lower.”
Terry Barone, communications team leader for the California Southern Baptist Convention (CSBC), said many CSBC churches will once again suspend in-person worship and go back online as result of the July 13 directive. But of the ones that meet, Barone believes some will still have singing.
“Baptists are an independent group,” he said. “Most of the churches are going to decide what their conviction is, whether they sing or not and how they do that. That would be the rule of thumb for the majority of our churches across the nation. It would be based on a biblical conviction of what we should be doing.”
Barone acknowledged that singing may carry a higher risk than other activities, but he said it appears churches have been treated differently than other establishments.
“There just seems to be a disparity in asking one group of the population, in particular churches, not to do certain things when it’s not enforced on other parts of the civilian population,” he said.
Ali Bay, a spokeswoman for the Office of Emergency Services said the guidance by the California Department of Public Health is a requirement, The Associated Press reported.
It “has the same authority as all of CDPH’s other guidance, directives, and orders, which the governor has ordered residents to heed,” Bay said.
The plaintiffs argue the guidance “specifically and discriminatorily targets places of worship.”
They say it violates their free exercise of religion that is guaranteed under the First Amendment and forces them into an “irresolvable conflict” of having to choose between following their “sincerely held religious beliefs” or the state mandates.
They also say the rules violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause by allowing only certain religious observances, including at-home religious activities.
Their suit, which also calls the state action a violation of free speech rights, noted what they consider an inconsistency in comparison to Newsom’s support of protests against police brutality.
“On or about July 2, 2020, following implementation of the Worship Ban, when asked to explain whether people should heed Newsom’s mandate and avoid large crowds and gatherings, Newsom refused to place the same restrictions on protestors and explained ‘we have a Constitution, we have a right to free speech,'” the complaint states, quoting a recent radio interview.
Citing verses from the Book of Psalms and the New Testament Book of Ephesians, which speaks of “psalms, hymns and spiritual songs,” the churches say in the suit that congregational singing is a key aspect of their worship.
“Singing and praying aloud as a body of Christ is an integral part of worship for believers,” they say. “To prohibit group singing and chanting is to effectively prohibit corporate Christian worship.”